Navigation

You are here: Home

Social Class Differences in Parenting? Revisiting Classed Childrearing through a Video-Ethnography of Mealtime

By on August 25, 2026 in Articles

Joanne W. Golann, Karen Phelan Kozlowski, Kara Mitchell Brennan

Sociological Science August 25, 2026
10.15195/v13.a40

PDF (37 views)
0 Citation


Sociological research has long established social class differences in childrearing strategies. However, recent studies suggest more heterogeneity by social class in parenting practices than previously recognized. In this article, we revisit families’ classed socialization processes by drawing from the New Jersey Families Study, a two-week, in-home video study of 21 families with young children, to examine how working-class and middle-class families interact with their children during mealtimes. Contrary to expectations, we found that social class did not neatly correspond to parenting styles, with half of families blending middle-class and working-class styles. This is one of the first sociological studies to closely observe the socialization of young children across different social classes. It is also one of few studies in sociology to use video-ethnographic data. Finally, this study challenges long-standing assumptions about class-based socialization, suggesting that in contemporary families, social class boundaries are much blurrier than previously believed when it comes to childrearing.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Joanne W. Golann: Department of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations, Vanderbilt University.
E-mail: j.golann@vanderbilt.edu.

Karen Phelan Kozlowski: School of Social Science and Global Studies, University of Southern Mississippi.
E-mail: karen.kozlowski@usm.edu.

Kara Mitchell Brennan: Department of Leadership, Policy, and Organizations, Vanderbilt University.
E-mail: kara.p.mitchell@vanderbilt.edu.

Acknowledgments: We thank Kanoe Bonilla, Emma Bufkin, Maria Maria Castillo, Sheila Chau, Ana Delgado, Catherine Duggan, Richard Hall, Susanna Harpold, Shihe Luan, Angelina Ma, Audrey Morris, Ben Rubin, Monica Shen, Erin Smith, and Grace Xu for research assistance on the New Jersey Families Study. We are grateful to Thomas Espenshade, Boriana Pratt, and Pamela Klebanov for data access and support. Corresponding author: j.golann@vanderbilt.edu.

Other Statements and Declarations: This research has been approved by the Princeton University Institutional Research Board. Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained for all families.

The authors have no financial or non-financial interests directly or indirectly related to the work to disclose.

The authors give consent to publish this manuscript.

Partial support for this work comes from the National Science Foundation–Sociology Grant #2214309, American Sociological Association Fund for the Advancement of the Discipline, Vanderbilt University Discovery Funds and Seeding Success grants, and the Peabody College Small Grants for Research.

The authors report no financial or non-financial interests directly or indirectly related to the work.



Reproducibility Package: Data are not publicly available due to informed consent agreements. For researchers interested in using the New Jersey Families Study data, please contact Joanne Golann for more information.


  • Citation: W. Golann, Joanne, Karen Phelan Kozlowski, Kara Mitchell Brennan. 2026. “Social Class Differences in Parenting? Revisiting Classed Childrearing through a Video-Ethnography of Mealtime” Sociological Science 13: 1046-1078.
  • Received: March 5, 2026
  • Accepted: July 16, 2026
  • Editors: Ari Adut, Elizabeth Bruch
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a40


0

Men’s Labor-Market Decline and the Rising Correlation between Spouses’ Earnings in the United States

By on August 20, 2026 in Articles

Yifan Shen

Sociological Science August 20, 2026
10.15195/v13.a39

PDF (143 views)
0 Citation


This study examines the role of deterioration in men’s labor-market conditions in explaining the rising correlation between spouses’ earnings in the United States. Prior research treats the growth of married women’s employment as the primary driver of this trend, leaving men’s declining economic position largely unexamined. Drawing on U.S. Census and American Community Survey data from 1960 to 2019 covering 722 commuting zones, I apply two-way fixed-effects models and a shift–share instrumental-variable design that exploits local variation in exposure to Chinese import competition across male- and female-intensive industries. Both approaches indicate that deterioration in men’s labor-market conditions raises the spousal earnings correlation within local labor markets, with the increase concentrated among couples with children. The pattern is class-stratified: where men’s conditions worsen, mothers’ work hours rise among those married to higher-earning men but little among those married to lower-earning men. This rising correlation thus reflects not only the growth of wives’ employment but also the unequally distributed capacity of families to adapt to men’s labor-market decline—an adaptation that itself amplifies inequality between households.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Yifan Shen: Division of Social Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
E-mail: yifanshen@ust.hk


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: The replication package contains the Stata code that reproduces every table and figure from the IPUMS census/ACS microdata, all third-party input data, and documentation describing how to download the IPUMS microdata (samples and variables) required as input data. It is available at https://doi.org/10.3886/E251260V1


  • Citation: Shen, Yifan. 2026. “Men’s Labor-Market Decline and the Rising Correlation between Spouses’ Earnings in the United States” Sociological Science 13:1018-1045.
  • Received: May 13, 2026
  • Accepted: July 21, 2026
  • Editors: Arnout van de Rijt, Michael Rosenfeld
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a39


0

Access to Higher Education and Support for Meritocracy: Effort, Skill, and Education as Components of Merit

By on August 18, 2026 in Articles

Hye Won Kwon, Jani Erola

Sociological Science August 18, 2026
10.15195/v13.a38

PDF (179 views)
0 Citation


Prior research has emphasized perceptions of effort-based meritocracy (i.e., the descriptive belief that hard work leads to success), noting a rising trend in meritocratic beliefs across countries. The current study proposes focusing on three components of merit—effort, skill, and education — and on a less-examined form of meritocratic beliefs: support for meritocracy (i.e., the prescriptive belief that society should distribute rewards based on merit). Analyzing the 2009 International Social Survey Programme data, this study demonstrates the role of higher education in shaping heterogeneity in support for meritocracy. College-educated individuals seem to reject effort-based meritocracy while strongly supporting skill- and education-based meritocracy. In addition, the gap between the college-educated and the non-college-educated in supporting education-based meritocracy is larger in countries with broader access to higher education. These findings suggest that people may refer to different dimensions of meritocracy when supporting or disapproving “meritocracy,” calling for refined policy interventions to reduce social inequalities.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Hye Won Kwon: Department of Sociology, Ewha Womans University.
E-mail: hwkwonsoc@ewha.ac.kr.

Jani Erola: INVEST Research Flagship Center, University of Turku.
E-mail: jani.erola@utu.fi.

Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2024S1A5A8020262). We gratefully acknowledge the Research Council of Finland flagship funding (INVEST, decision number 320162) and Academy Professor’s funding (STRATEQ, decision number 371741). Direct Correspondence to Hye Won Kwon (E-mail: hwkwonsoc@ewha.ac.kr).


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: A reproducibility package that includes codes and macro-level data is available at https://github.com/INVEST-flagship/Kwon-Erola-2026. The ISSP 2009 survey data cannot be uploaded to publicly available locations, because the data can be accessed only after the user registration through the GESIS portal. The ISSP 2009 data are available via the GESIS portal: https://www.gesis.org/en/issp/data-and-documentation/
social-inequality/2009.


  • Citation: Kwon, Hye Won, Jani Erola. 2026. “Access to Higher Education and Support for Meritocracy: Effort, Skill, and Education as Components of Merit” Sociological Science 13: 997-1017.
  • Received: August 5, 2025
  • Accepted: July 5, 2026
  • Editors: Ari Adut, Nan Dirk de Graaf
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a38


0

Decoupling Inequality and Stratification in the American Wealth Distribution, 1989–2022

By on August 11, 2026 in Articles

Jake Burchard, Lisa A. Keister

Sociological Science August 11, 2026
10.15195/v13.a37

PDF (269 views)
0 Citation


Wealth inequality in the United States has grown substantially in recent decades, yet it remains unclear whether wealth has become more stratified along socially salient, group-based lines. Insofar as intragroup solidarities and intergroup antagonisms depend on the extent to which groups are arranged into minimally overlapping, hierarchically ordered strata within the wealth distribution, stratification is sociologically important independently of inequality. Using Survey of Consumer Finances data from 1989 to 2022 and a nonparametric, rank-based stratification metric, we examine trends in wealth stratification across multiple axes of social difference, including racialized group membership, age, education, employment-based class, and marital status. We find that stratification declined along several dimensions, with education being the main exception. Decomposition analyses show that these dimensions differ not only by the level of stratification they exhibit over time but also by where in the distribution stratification is primarily generated and by the relative contributions of housing and nonhousing wealth. These findings underscore the importance of wealth composition and distributional location in shaping stratification and encourage scholars to explore how wealth accumulation may harden or weaken group boundaries.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Jake Burchard: Department of Sociology, Duke University.
E-mail: jake.burchard@duke.edu.

Lisa A. Keister: Department of Sociology, Duke University; Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University.
E-mail: lkeister@duke.edu.

Acknowledgments: We thank the editors and two anonymous external reviewers for their comments and suggestions. We also thank Jianyu Hong for research assistance.

Funding: This research received support from the Population Dynamics Research Infrastructure Program award to the Duke Population Research Center (P2C HD065563) at Duke University by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: Data and code to reproduce all results reported in the paper are available at: https://gitlab.oit.duke.edu/jkb83/decoupling-inequality-and-stratification-replication-package.


  • Citation: Burchard, Jake, and Lisa A. Keister. 2026. “Decoupling Inequality and Stratification in the American Wealth Distribution, 1989–2022” Sociological Science 13: 971-996.
  • Received: April 27, 2026
  • Accepted: June 23, 2026
  • Editors: Ari Adut, Ray Reagans
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a37


0

Quantities of Interest for Interactions and the Pitfalls of Assuming Linear Treatment Effects

By on August 6, 2026 in Articles

Josep Serrano-Serrat

Sociological Science August 6, 2026
10.15195/v13.a36

PDF (237 views)
0 Citation


Although quantitative social sciences often rely on estimating models in which treatment effects vary across groups, researchers rarely specify which causal quantity they aim to estimate or justify their empirical modeling choices. This article makes two contributions. First, it clarifies the distinct quantities of interest when studying interactions: comparisons at different treatment intensities (the difference in conditional average marginal effects) and comparisons at similar intensities (what I term the average interactive partial effect). When treatment effects are nonlinear and treatment distributions differ across groups, these quantities diverge. Second, the article assesses estimation strategies to estimate these quantities. It demonstrates that linear interaction models produce biased estimates of either quantity when treatment effects are nonlinear and explores two alternatives that explicitly accommodate such nonlinearities. This article is accompanied by an R package that implements these approaches. Through simulations, stylized examples, and an empirical application, the article shows that explicitly defining the quantity of interest and selecting appropriate models is essential for valid interaction analysis.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Josep Serrano-Serrat: Institute for Public Goods and Policies (IPP), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC).
E-mail: j.serrano.serrat@csic.es.

Acknowledgments: An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2024 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association in Philadelphia and the 2025 Annual Conference of the Swiss Political Science Association in Genève. I am grateful to Cesc Amat, Ignacio Jurado, Patrick W. Kraft, Sergi Martínez, and Marco Steenbergen for their valuable comments and suggestions, which substantially improved the article. I also thank Felix Elwert, as Editor of Sociological Methods & Research, Arnout van de Rijt, as Editor of Sociological Science, and an anonymous reviewer for their insightful feedback and constructive guidance throughout the revision process.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: All code necessary to replicate this study is available in an OSF repository at https://osf.io/8tx6g/.


  • Citation: Serrano-Serrat, Josep. 2026. “Quantities of Interest for Interactions and the Pitfalls of Assuming Linear Treatment Effects” Sociological Science 13:945-970.
  • Received: March 11, 2026
  • Accepted: June 23, 2026
  • Editors: Arnout van de Rijt, Kristian B. Karlson
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a36


0

Bending the Heckman Curve: Competing Declines in Learning Capacity and Skill Relevance Over the Life Course

By on August 4, 2026 in Articles

João M. Souto-Maior, Mitchell L. Stevens

Sociological Science August 4, 2026
10.15195/v13.a35

PDF (868 views)
0 Citation


The Heckman curve has powerfully influenced social policy by providing mathematical support for the concentration of human-capital investments early in the life course. The canonical model behind this curve derives a single relationship for aggregate human capital and does not address how return trajectories vary across skill types. We extend the canonical mathematical framework to derive skill-specific return trajectories, incorporating two key parameters governing declines in (a) human capacity to learn and (b) skill relevance over the life course. Our microfoundation model implies that the shape of return trajectories depends on the relative magnitudes of these two declines, indicating a trade-off: although early investments may be more efficient due to declining human learning capacity, they risk misalignment with future labor market needs. Depending on the targeted skill, investments in adult workers might more effectively align with evolving skill content. We illustrate this result with numerical simulations using empirically plausible parameter ranges and selected skill profiles. Our work suggests that optimal investment timing may be skill-dependent, and identifies empirical questions that can better inform human-capital policy in a time of rapid technological change and lengthening lifespans.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


João M. Souto-Maior: Stanford Center on Longevity and Graduate School of Education, Stanford University.
E-mail: joao.msoutomaior@gmail.com.

Mitchell L. Stevens: Graduate School of Education and Stanford Center on Longevity, Stanford University.
E-mail: stevens4@stanford.edu.

Acknowledgments: This paper is part of the project “Education and Learning for Longer Lives,” sponsored by the Stanford Center on Longevity (SCL) in 2025–2026. We thank the SCL’s Futures Fellows and New Map of Life Postdoctoral Fellows for the contexts in which this work germinated. We are especially grateful to Bernardo Mackenna, Chris Heitzig, Leon Marbach, and Arik Lifschitz for written feedback, and to Matt Sigelman for valuable advice. Earlier versions of this work benefited from critical feedback (all in 2025) in Stanford’s Pathways Network Seminar and Inequality Workshop, the SCL Fellows Seminar, the Sociological Science Annual Conference, and the International Network of Analytical Sociology Conference. Any errors are our own.


Supplemental Materials

Data and code availability statement: This paper does not use external data. Full replication code for numerical simulations and figures available at: https://github.com/joaosoutomaior/competing-declines-code.


  • Citation: Souto-Maior, João M., and Mitchell L. Stevens. 2026. “Bending the Heckman Curve: Competing Declines in Learning Capacity and Skill Relevance Over the Life Course” Sociological Science 13: 915-944.
  • Received: April 9, 2026
  • Accepted: June 16, 2026
  • Editors: Stephen Vaisey, Herman van de Werfhorst
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a35


0

Categorical Engagement and the Contingent Nature of Typicality Effects

By on July 28, 2026 in Articles

Alex Tyulyupo, Balázs Kovács

Sociological Science July 28, 2026
10.15195/v13.a34

PDF (312 views)
0 Citation


Market categories can favor typical members over atypical ones, yet this “categorical imperative” operates inconsistently across contexts. We argue that typicality effects depend on how evaluators engage with categories during search. Using behavioral simulation in which participants search a large database of companies for competitors, we distinguish between searches that explicitly invoke industry classifications and those using alternative methods, and measure goal-category congruence through semantic alignment between evaluators’ objectives and the categories they employ. We find that typical companies become more likely to be selected in category-based searches; other searches produce no typicality effects. Among category-based searches, goal-category congruence moderates the effect: typicality strongly predicts selection when goals and categories misalign but becomes irrelevant when they align well. These findings identify a specific microprocess through which categorical effects become contingent, offering a process-level explanation for variation documented across audiences, producer characteristics, and evaluation contexts.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Alex Tyulyupo: Yale School of Management, Yale University.
E-mail: alex.tyulyupo@yale.edu.

Balázs Kovács: Yale School of Management, Yale University.
E-mail: balazs.kovacs@yale.edu.

Acknowledgments: We thank Ceclin Begbie and Robert Bartholomew for their management of the behavioral lab. We thank Maciej Workiewicz, Elisa Operti, and Stoyan Sgourev for their input. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Yale School of Management. We benefited from feedback received at the 2025 Nagymaros Conference and the Yale School of Management OBID seminar.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: De-identified, model-ready data and code for reproducing all statistical tables and figures are available at (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6Z8RS). Raw Crunchbase records, company and venture descriptions, and participant-identifying information are not shared because of data-use and confidentiality restrictions.


  • Citation: Tyulyupo, Alex, and Kovács, Balázs. 2026. “Categorical Engagement and the Contingent Nature of Typicality Effects” Sociological Science 13:884-914.
  • Received: May 6, 2026
  • Accepted: June 23, 2026
  • Editors: Ari Adut, Clayton Childress
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a34


0

Information Diets Are More Diverse in Attention Than in Engagement

By on July 21, 2026 in Articles

Christopher Barrie, Aybuke Atalay, Alia ElKattan

Sociological Science July 21, 2026
10.15195/v13.a33

PDF (525 views)
0 Citation


What political content do we pay attention to online? Diverse political information is essential for democratic competence, yet online media raises concerns about fragmented information diets. Research on selective exposure highlights how social media can foster ideological echo chambers, while other studies emphasize incidental exposure to diverse viewpoints. A critical measurement challenge is that public platform traces often observe engagement (e.g., likes or shares) more readily than lower-visibility forms of attention—i.e., what users notice or choose to read without necessarily interacting publicly. In this study, we address this gap with a social media clone platform that separately records attention and engagement. We ran the study in both the United Kingdom (once) and the United States (thrice). Across both contexts, we found that the ideology-engagement association is significantly larger than the ideology-attention association. This underscores the importance of measuring attention, rather than solely engagement, to accurately assess the diversity of online information diets.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Christopher Barrie: Department of Sociology, New York University.
E-mail: cb5691@nyu.edu

Aybuke Atalay: Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Edinburgh.
E-mail: aybuke.atalay@ed.ac.uk

Alia ElKattan: Department of Politics, New York University.
E-mail: alia.elkattan@nyu.edu

Acknowledgments: We thank audiences at the NYU Center for Social Media and Politics for their feedback on earlier versions of this paper. This research was supported by a British Academy/Leverhulme Small Research Grant (SRG2223 230865). OpenAI GPT-4o and GPT-5 and Anthropic Claude (Sonnet 4.5) were used for code, code review, and manuscript redrafting. The authors declare no competing interests. Corresponding author: Christopher Barrie (cb5691@nyu.edu).


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: Data, code, documentation, and replication materials necessary to re-produce the empirical and simulation results reported in this article are available at https://github.com/cjbarrie/smclone.


  • Citation: Barrie, Christopher, Aybuke Atalay, and Alia ElKattan. 2026. “Information Diets Are More Diverse in Attention Than in Engagement” Sociological Science 13: 864-883.
  • Received: April 9, 2026
  • Accepted: June 8, 2026
  • Editors: Ari Adut, Kieran Healy
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a33


0

A Roadmap for Inequality Research: Transparency, Intersectionality, and Multiple Measures of Race

By on July 9, 2026 in Articles

Emma Williams-Baron, Aliya Saperstein

Sociological Science July 9, 2026
10.15195/v13.a32

PDF (822 views)
0 Citation


Most quantitative studies of U.S. inequality rely on single measures of race and do not transparently describe them. However, inconsistencies between measures can yield conclusions that differ both substantively and statistically. We ask: when faced with multiple ways to categorize respondents, how should researchers choose? We conduct intersectional analyses of five inequality outcomes, using the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, which offers several measures of self-identification and external classification. Strikingly, we find the survey’s screener race variable, ubiquitous in prior research, is never empirically preferred based on model fit across outcomes spanning the labor market (wages, salary, and unemployment), health (depression), and education (school discipline). Instead, the top-performing measure varies by gender, outcome, and fit statistic. The range of potential researcher decisions and the absence of a clear gold-standard highlights the need for greater transparency and more thoughtful decision-making when researchers operationalize race—whether racial categorization is central to the analysis or included primarily as a control variable. To that end, we offer a roadmap of key considerations inequality researchers can consult when designing their approach.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Emma Williams-Baron: Department of Sociology, Stanford University. E-mail: emmajwb@stanford.edu.
Aliya Saperstein: Department of Sociology, Stanford University. E-mail: asaper@stanford.edu.

Acknowledgments: We are grateful to our colleagues in the gender and inequality workshops at Stanford University for their helpful comments and suggestions, and to Steve McClaskie for responding to inquiries about the NLSY. Previous versions of this paper were presented at the 2024 American Sociological Association annual meeting and at a 2023 conference on racial inequality in education research hosted by NWEA in Portland, OR. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-1656518. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: Data and code for reproducing the results presented in this article are publicly
available in an Open Science Framework repository here: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K3RZT. Data may also be accessed through the NLSY Investigator site at: https://www.nlsinfo.org/investigator.


  • Citation: Williams-Baron, Emma, Aliya Saperstein. 2026. “A Roadmap for Inequality Research: Transparency, Intersectionality, and Multiple Measures of Race” Sociological Science 13: 825-863.
  • Received: September 20, 2025
  • Accepted: May 18, 2026
  • Editors: Arnout van de Rijt, Kristian B. Karlson
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a32


0

Leveraging Genomic Data to Document Within-Race Attractiveness Penalties Among Black Americans

By on July 7, 2026 in Articles

Beza Taddess, Luyin Zhang, Sam Trejo

Sociological Science July 7, 2026
10.15195/v13.a31

PDF (1550 views)
0 Citation


In recent years, scholars of racial inequality have increasingly sought to move beyond simply quantifying discrete racial disparities and instead measure social stratification as a function of continuous racialized characteristics that vary both within and between racial groups. In this article, we draw on a sample of genotyped respondents from the Add Health study and construct genetic similarity proportions, individual-level measures that correlate with racialized physical features that vary across the expansive family tree of humanity (skin tone, facial structure, hair texture, etc.). We then investigate the relationship between these proportions and interviewer-rated physical attractiveness among self-identified Black Americans (N=2,087). Our findings highlight the existence of substantial attractiveness penalties related to having higher levels of Sub-Saharan African (as opposed to European) genetic similarity.
Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Beza Taddess: Department of Sociology, Princeton University. E-mail: bt7304@princeton.edu
Luyin Zhang: Office of Population Research, Princeton University. E-mail: luyin.zhang@princeton.edu
Sam Trejo: Department of Sociology and Office of Population Research, Princeton University. E-mail: samtrejo@princeton.edu

Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Dalton Conley, Filiz Garip, Iain Mathieson, Ellis Monk, and Marissa Thompson for helpful comments. This research uses data from Add Health, funded by grant P01 HD31921 (Harris) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Add Health is currently directed by Robert A. Hummer and funded by the National Institute on Aging cooperative agreements U01 AG071448 (Hummer) and U01AG071450 (Hummer and Aiello) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Add Health was designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. No direct support was received from grant P01 HD31921 for this analysis. Information on obtaining Add Health data is available on the project website. Send correspondence to Sam Trejo, samtrejo@princeton.edu.

Significance Statement: This study provides new evidence on how racialized physical features shape social experiences within a single self-identified racial group. By using genetic similarity proportions—genetic ancestry measures that correlate with physical traits such as skin tone and facial structure—the authors show that Black Americans with higher levels of Sub-Saharan African genetic similarity are systematically rated as less physically attractive. These results reveal a form of racialized disadvantage that operates within racial categories and is not captured by typical survey measures and help explain why traditional surveys report relatively small Black–White attractiveness gaps (whereas real-world behavior shows much larger differences). More broadly, the study offers genetic similarity proportions as a new tool for exploring processes of racialization in contemporary society.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: All results needed to evaluate the conclusions in the article are present in the article and/or the Supplementary Materials. All syntax files needed to replicate our main text analyses are available at the following link: https://github.com/luyin-z/attractiveness_penalties. We utilized the restricted Add Health survey and genotype data, which can be accessed by researchers via application at https://data.cpc.unc.edu/projects/2/view.


  • Citation: Taddess, Beza, Luyin Zhang, and Sam Trejo. 2026. “Leveraging Genomic Data to Document Within-Race Attractiveness Penalties Among Black Americans” Sociological Science 13: 802-824.
  • Received: March 24, 2026
  • Accepted: May 13, 2026
  • Editors: Ari Adut, Ellis Monk
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a31


0

The Double Bind of Precarious Work: Creating Need and Undermining Support

By on July 1, 2026 in Articles

Tyler Woods, Kristen Harknett, Daniel Schneider

Sociological Science July 2, 2026
10.15195/v13.a30

PDF (690 views)
0 Citation


For most adults in the United States, participation in the labor force is a normative expectation and a pre-requisite for social acceptance and inclusion. Yet, the conditions of low-wage work can breed social isolation by interfering with supportive social ties at and outside of work. Drawing on survey data from The Shift Project, we examine the complex interplay between precarious working conditions and supportive social ties and illuminate a vicious cycle faced by low-wage workers. Precarious work schedule conditions are associated with reduced perceptions of support from social ties and act as a mechanism through which precarious working conditions take a toll on worker well-being. Further, those with precarious work schedules are less likely to benefit from the buffering effect of social support that attenuates the negative consequences of unstable and unpredictable schedules on well-being. Our findings demonstrate negative externalities of precarious working conditions for social support and reveal the double bind of precarious work: schedule instability undermines workers’ social support while simultaneously heightening the need for it.
Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Tyler Woods: Harvard Kennedy School. E-mail: tyler.woods@bain.com.
Kristen Harknett: University of California, Berkeley, Department of Sociology. E-mail: kharknett@berkeley.edu.
Daniel Schneider: Harvard Kennedy School. E-mail: dschneider@hks.harvard.edu.

Acknowledgments: We gratefully acknowledge support from the National Institute on Aging (Grant Nos. R01AG066898 and R56AG081273), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Grant No. U19OH012293), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant Nos. INV-002665 and INV-016942), the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Award No. 74528), and the W.T. Grant Foundation (Grant No. 188043). The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of these foundations. The authors received excellent research support from Kevin Bruey, Connor Williams, and Alessandra Soto.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: Information on accessing the administrative register data and all code used in the analysis is available at: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/
OEGXOW.


  • Citation: Woods, Tyler, Kristen Harknett, and Daniel Schneider. 2026. “The Double Bind of Precarious Work: Creating Need and Undermining Support” Sociological Science 13: 772-801.
  • Received: January 5, 2026
  • Accepted: April 28, 2026
  • Editors: Stephen Vaisey, Michael Rosenfeld
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a30


0

Teacher Sorting and Inequalities in Student Achievement: Unequal Exposures and Differential Returns to Teacher Qualifications

By on June 30, 2026 in Articles

Said Hassan

Sociological Science June 30, 2026
10.15195/v13.a29

PDF (977 views)
0 Citation


Teachers play a formative role in shaping children’s school experiences and ultimately, their educational outcomes. In this study, I use full population Danish administrative data to explore the consequences of unequal access to qualified teachers in three steps. First, I document strong patterns of teacher–student sorting in Denmark, one of the world’s most equal societies and generous welfare states. In short, teachers from higher socioeconomic backgrounds and with higher prior academic achievements tend to select into schools serving high-achieving children from privileged backgrounds. Second, I investigate the effect of exposure to teachers with different qualifications on students’ test score performance. To facilitate causal estimates, I exploit plausibly exogenous shocks to teacher changes induced by parental leave spells, which, I show, are unrelated to an extensive set of observed classroom characteristics, including student well-being and measures of classroom climate. Third, I explore differentials in the impact of teacher qualifications by students’ socioeconomic background. I find no consistent evidence of differential teacher effects, implying that teacher-induced learning inequalities are mainly driven by unequal exposure to highly qualified teachers, rather than unequal returns to qualifications. This suggests that policies equalizing access to qualified teachers may reduce learning disparities.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Said Hassan: Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
E-mail: said.aj.hassan@gmail.com.

Acknowledgments: I am grateful to Richard Breen, David Kirk, Per Engzell, Dirk Witteveen, Anders Hjorth-Trolle, Miriam Gensowski, Janne Jonsson, John Ermisch, Ahmed Tohamy, Anders Holm, and Lars Højsgaard Andersen for their very helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions. This research was supported by the ROCKWOOL Foundation (grant number 1231).


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: Information on accessing the administrative register data and all code used in the analysis is available at: https://github.com/s-aj-hassan/Teacher-Sorting-Achievement.


  • Citation: Hassan, Said. 2026. “Teacher Sorting and Inequalities in Student Achievement: Unequal Exposures and Differential Returns to Teacher Qualifications” Sociological Science 13: 747-771.
  • Received: March 30, 2026
  • Accepted: April 17, 2026
  • Editors: Arnout van de Rijt, Herman van de Werfhorst
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a29


0

The Exception to Women’s Advantage: How Rurality, Red Counties, and the Local Economy Shape Gender Gaps in Educational Attainment

By on June 25, 2026 in Articles

April Sutton, Bernardo Mackenna, Bolun Zhang, Amanda Bosky

Sociological Science June 25, 2026
10.15195/v13.a28

PDF (901 views)
0 Citation


Rural communities have lagged urban areas in the economic and sociocultural shifts thought to underlie women’s advantage in bachelor’s degree (BA) attainment, such as the expansion of high-status professional jobs and increasing gender egalitarianism. Using nationally representative data (ELS:2002), we bridge the gap between the macroscale factors theorized to drive women’s educational gains and the local environments shaping youth outcomes by analyzing gender patterns in BA attainment across rural and urban high school students. Women who attended high school in metropolitan areas hold a clear BA advantage, but not women who attended nonmetropolitan high schools, where girls earn higher grades than boys yet attain bachelor’s degrees at similar rates. We find that, net of other characteristics, women’s BA advantage is most suppressed in rural counties with strong Republican majorities and limited professional employment opportunities. Overall, our study suggests that women’s BA advantage is geographically uneven and varies across local sociopolitical and economic conditions.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


April Sutton: UC San Diego-Dept. of Sociology.
E-mail: asutton@ucsd.edu.

Bernardo Mackenna: UC San Diego-Dept. of Sociology.
E-mail: bmackenn@stanford.edu.

Bolun Zhang: UC San Diego-Dept. of Sociology.
E-mail: bolunzhang@zju.edu.cn.

Amanda Bosky: UC San Diego-Dept. of Sociology.
E-mail: abosky@utexas.edu.

Acknowledgments: This research was supported by a National Academy of Education/Spencer postdoctoral fellowship and a UC San Diego Hellman Fellowship awarded to April Sutton. We are grateful for the helpful feedback of anonymous reviewers. The article also benefited from presentations at the NAEd Annual Meeting and Fall Retreat and the Population Association of America.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: A replication package, including code, documentation, and links/DOIs to data sources, is available at Zenodo (doi:10.5281/zenodo.17336597). The primary analyses use restricted-access data from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) within the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), U.S. Department of Education. These data are available only to approved investigators through the IES/NCES application process (https://ies.ed.gov/about/restricted-use-data). We provide the URLs/DOIs and table identifiers needed to retrieve the publicly available data (e.g., U.S. Census summary files) we used to augment the ELS:2002.


  • Citation: Sutton, April, Bernardo Mackenna, Bolun Zhang, and Amanda Bosky. 2026. “The Exception to Women’s Advantage: How Rurality, Red Counties, and the Local Economy Shape Gender Gaps in Educational Attainment” Sociological Science 13:712-746.
  • Received: May 15, 2025
  • Accepted: October 13, 2025
  • Editors: Arnout van de Rijt, Kristian B. Karlson
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a28


0

Clickbait Crime News? Metrics and Professional Authority in Local Newsrooms

By on June 22, 2026 in Articles

Jonathan Ben-Menachem

Sociological Science June 22, 2026
10.15195/v13.a27

PDF (677 views)
0 Citation


Existing research on newsroom metrics documents how journalists construct compatibility between discordant professional and commercial evaluation frameworks. This study examines the underexplored case where metrics validate existing practices. Drawing on interviews with 58 crime journalists in 40 U.S. newsrooms, I find that reporters whose work consistently performed well on audience metrics often defended professional evaluation criteria. Editors facilitated this defense through brokerage, absorbing commercial logics so reporters could experience their work as professionally guided. Market position structured interpretive responses: reporters could avoid metrics, override them, selectively appropriate them, or integrate them into practice. The transition from pageview to subscription regimes reshaped whether concordance was experienced as contaminating or legitimating. Even under concordance, journalists defended professional evaluation criteria.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Jonathan Ben-Menachem: Department of Sociology, Columbia University.
E-mail: jb4487@columbia.edu.

Acknowledgments: I gratefully acknowledge feedback from my colleagues in Columbia Sociology’s Qual Lab, my graduate school cohort, and several anonymous reviewers and journal editors. In particular, I thank Ari Galper, Emily Mazo, Tey Meadow, Michael Schudson, Mario Small, and Bruce Western for their generous engagement with this project at various stages. Finally, I thank the journalists who shared their time and experiences with me.


Supplemental Materials


  • Citation: Ben-Menachem, Jonathan. 2026. “Clickbait Crime News? Metrics and Professional Authority in Local Newsrooms” Sociological Science 13: 685-711.
  • Received: March 11, 2026
  • Accepted: May 5, 2026
  • Editors: Ari Adut, Kieran Healy
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a27


0

Beyond Text: Using AI-Generated Visual Conjoints to Study Gender and Housework Attribution

By on June 16, 2026 in Articles

Léa Pessin, Kevin Munger

Sociological Science June 16, 2026
10.15195/v13.a26

PDF (1180 views)
0 Citation


Despite substantial gender convergence in education and employment, women continue to perform a disproportionate share of housework. We employ a novel visual conjoint experiment to isolate the normative mechanisms underlying this persistent inequality. Using AI-generated photorealistic images, we systematically vary the tidiness of domestic spaces, room type, source of mess, socioeconomic status, and the gender and race/ethnicity of occupants, alongside text describing couples’ employment arrangements. A quota sample of 2,994 U.S. respondents each evaluated five vignettes, yielding 14,970 observations. We find that gender effects operate primarily through responsibility attribution rather than through differential perception of messiness or anticipated social judgment. Women are assigned significantly more cleaning responsibility than men, with the gender penalty concentrated among dual-earner couples. Child-caused mess is perceived as messier than adult-caused mess yet carries reduced social consequences, suggesting that it operates as a legitimating excuse. Our findings suggest that gender equality in paid work is necessary for achieving gender equality in housework, but that it is not sufficient, and that this gap will persist absent changes in normative expectations around responsibility for housework.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Léa Pessin: Department of Social and Political Science, European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy.
E-mail: lea.pessin@eui.eu.

Kevin Munger: Department of Social and Political Science, European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy.
E-mail: kevin.munger@eui.eu

Acknowledgments: This work has benefited from generous feedback from the Bocconi Dondena Seminar Speaker Series and the LMU Munich Department of Sociology Research Colloquium. Pessin acknowledges funding by the European Union, under the European Research Council grant for the WeEqualize project (grant agreement no. 101117327). Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: Replication materials including all data and code and documentation necessary to reproduce all empirical results reported in the article can be found at https://github.com/kmunger/Housekeeping_SocSci_Replication.


  • Citation: Pessin, Léa, Kevin Munger, 2026. “Beyond Text: Using AI-Generated Visual Conjoints to Study Gender and Housework Attribution” Sociological Science 13: 661-684.
  • Received: January 20, 2026
  • Accepted: April 14, 2026
  • Editors: Ari Adut, Elizabeth Bruch
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a26


0

Changing Opportunity: Rising Local Wealth Inequality and Growing Class Gaps in Income Mobility

By on June 15, 2026 in Articles

Manuel Schechtl, Florencia Torche

Sociological Science June 15, 2026
10.15195/v13.a25

PDF (460 views)
0 Citation


Recent research documents widening class gaps in intergenerational income mobility in the United States. Children from low-income families in more recent cohorts attain lower incomes than their counterparts in earlier cohorts, while no comparable decline is observed among children from high-income families. This study examines whether rising local wealth inequality contributes to this growing class divide in mobility. To do so, it combines newly published estimates of local wealth inequality from GEOWEALTH-US with cohort-based measures of upward mobility from Opportunity Insights. First-difference models reveal a consistent negative association between rising local wealth inequality and declining upward income mobility for children from low-income families, but no comparable association for their high-income peers. These associations are robust to economic and demographic changes, including, critically, changes in income inequality. A decomposition exercise suggests that rising local wealth inequality accounts for roughly one-fifth of the observed increase in class gaps in mobility. Together, the findings identify local wealth inequality as a central dimension of stratification shaping children’s economic opportunities above and beyond income inequality.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Manuel Schechtl: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
E-mail: schechtl@unc.edu

Florencia Torche: Princeton University.
E-mail: ftorche@princeton.edu

Acknowledgments: This research was funded by the Volkswagen Foundation.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package All code necessary to replicate
this study is available in an OSF repository at: https://osf.io/a3vfd/


  • Citation: Schechtl, Manuel, Florencia Torche. 2026. “Changing Opportunity: Rising Local Wealth Inequality and Growing Class Gaps in Income Mobility” Sociological Science 13: 645-660.
  • Received: March 13, 2026
  • Accepted: April 27, 2026
  • Editors: Stephen Vaisey, Herman van de Werfhorst
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a25


0

Declining Inequality and Persistent Inequality Structures

By on June 10, 2026 in Articles

Soohyun Roh, Nathan Wilmers

Sociological Science June 10, 2026
10.15195/v13.a24

PDF (998 views)
0 Citation


Prior research finds that rising labor market inequality in the United States was abetted by structural changes in the economy: a consolidation of occupation and organizational bases of advantage; rising within-job inequality; and declining pay and employment in middle-earning jobs. In this article, we revisit these structural changes by asking whether they have been reversed as labor market inequality fell over the last decade. Drawing on restricted-use microdata from the Occupational Employment and Wages Statistics, we find that declining inequality is due to declining inequality in occupation premiums. There has been only a small reversal of consolidation and no decrease in inequality within jobs. Low-wage jobs gained on shrinking middle-earning occupations, further eroding union, manufacturing, and public sector wage premiums. These findings demonstrate a novel configuration of labor market inequality, in which pay rose in low-wage jobs, but underlying inequality structures in the economy persisted.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Soohyun Roh: Sloan School of Management, MIT
E-mail: rohs@mit.edu.

Nathan Wilmers: Sloan School of Management, MIT
E-mail: wilmers@mit.edu.

Acknowledgments: Thank you for very helpful comments from the MIT Applied Microeconomics Seminar, University of Maryland Strategy Seminar, NYU Sociology Colloquium, Columbia Center for Wealth and Inequality Seminar, Russell Sage Foundation Visiting Scholar Seminar, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management Seminar, and Stockholm University Department of Economics Seminar. This research was conducted with restricted access to Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the BLS or the US government. This research was funded by MIT Sloan. Please direct correspondence to wilmers@mit.edu.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: Full replication code is available at https://osf.io/8tbwh. In June 2025, the BLS suspended researcher access to its restricted data. As such, data for the bulk of this analysis are no longer accessible for replication (or to Roh and Wilmers). If the BLS restarts its data access program, then data will be accessible through the application as a visiting researcher.


  • Citation: Roh, Soohyun, Nathan Wilmers. 2026. “Declining Inequality and Persistent Inequality Structures” Sociological Science 13: 614-644.
  • Received: October 16, 2025
  • Accepted: February 26, 2026
  • Editors: Arnout van de Rijt, Cristobal Young
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a24


0

Family Networks and Childcare Choices: A Predictive Machine Learning Approach

By on June 2, 2026 in Articles

Nicolás Soler, Tom Emery, Agnieszka Kanas

Sociological Science June 2, 2026
10.15195/v13.a23

PDF (798 views)
0 Citation


How first-time parents arrange childcare has critical implications for their careers and the child’s development. Previous research shows that childcare choices are shaped by family care availability, understood as an additive function of a small set of parental and grandparental characteristics. However, research on family networks suggests that care availability is rather a non-linear, non-additive function of large family networks. We compare the predictive ability of these two perspectives using a machine learning framework and register-based family network data. We find that considering how the child’s great-grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins shape care availability, and modeling their influence using more flexible models, provides small yet significant improvements in predictive ability, particularly among more disadvantaged parents. Predictions are driven by parents’ and grandparents’ socioeconomic characteristics, but cousins’ age and daycare use are important yet understudied predictors. Other important understudied predictors include parents’ self-employment, healthcare spending, and timing of daycare uptake.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Nicolás Soler: Department of Public Administration and Sociology, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
E-mail: soleralvarezmiranda@essb.eur.nl.

Tom Emery: Department of Public Administration and Sociology, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
E-mail: tom@odissei-data.nl.

Agnieszka Kanas: Department of Public Administration and Sociology, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
E-mail: kanas@essb.eur.nl.


Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: Code to reproduce the results can be found at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19189668. The data are non-public microdata from Statistics Netherlands that are accessible to accredited researchers under certain conditions (see Statistics Netherlands 2026).


  • Citation: Soler, Nicolás, Tom Emery, Agnieszka Kanas, 2026. “Family Networks and Childcare Choices: A Predictive Machine Learning Approach” Sociological Science 13: 589-613.
  • Received: February 18, 2026
  • Accepted: March 23, 2026
  • Editors: Stephen Vaisey, Michael Rosenfeld
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a23


0
SiteLock